Facts About valid marriage pakistani case law Revealed

Facts About valid marriage pakistani case law Revealed

Blog Article

Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights when respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. Over the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided with the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court 92. 9. The aforesaid exceptions are lacking in the present case. In this kind of circumstances, this petition is found to be not maintainable and is particularly dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more

However, In the event the same person were charged with section three hundred and 302, their defence that they never intended to get rid of the person – and that they just desired to injure them or incapacitate them –, will are unsuccessful, given that the elements in the offence only demand the intent to cause injury to be proven, not the intention to cause death.

limitation of liability for the extent of a cap provided because of the registered mortgage deed(Banking Law)

Note: Please fill any subject and Click on Search button, if you do not know the complete information please leave subject blank.

94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually perfectly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 times. If the appeal is not really decided within that timeframe, he/she will then strategy the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as being the ninety days for your department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we are guided from the decision with the Supreme Court within the case of Dr.

For your foregoing reasons the instant suit is dismissed with no order regarding cost. Office to prepare decree in the above mentioned terms. Read more

seventy three . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Pertaining to the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 from the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice just isn't served, the grievance petition is often dismissed. This is because service of the grievance notice can be a mandatory prerequisite along with a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The legislation demands that a grievance notice be served on the employer before filing a grievance check here petition. This allows the employer to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If the employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In the event the organization is transprovincial.

Binding Precedent – A rule or principle recognized by a court, which other courts are obligated to stick to.

thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that once the act of misconduct is set up as well as employee is found guilty after due process of regulation, it is the prerogative in the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, out of the different penalties provided in regulation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is not really proportionate with the seriousness with the act of misconduct will not be sufficient though the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion within a structured and lawful fashion. Read more

This case continues to be cited in various subsequent judgments, particularly in cases involving constitutional legislation, judicial independence, along with the rule of law.

Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses for example self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which may possibly end in reduced charges or acquittal.

Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury into a person, by doing an act which during the ordinary course of nature is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently dangerous that it must in all likelihood cause death, causes the death from the these person, is said to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”

share or interest of the co-owner in immovable property may also sold to another co-owner/co-sharer as well as to an stranger and section forty four(Transfer of Property Act 1882)

P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should also be dismissed. Suffice is to look at that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are absolutely different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case regulation titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it has been held through the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--